ContactI respond to ALL mails that are not spam within a day or two, with a real answer, not a script even if it takes hours to answer them. IF you mailed me and got no response, it got intercepted.
Web resourcesI am going to post the most valuable web resources here.
This is the best video sniping site, you don't have to buy the app, just use it and let it use Java.
Internet explorer hates this, but Google chrome works fine.
This is the best absolute stealth mode Linux out there, (Kills ubuntu dead) but you need an older PC for it (4 or more years)
When it downloads, double click it with a burnable CD in your drive, NOT a dvd, and it will take care of the rest. Re-boot via CD and enjoy. You don't have to install it, and it leaves your computer untouched.
Since Vialls work was so similar to mine, it will be archived here.
This is missing a lot, it has to be fixed.
Newly released court document STRONGLY supports my case that no one died at the theater
"The stunning accusations, dated August 27, reveal a startling story by the claimant as having been visited at home by police chief Dan Oates and Dist. Atty. Carol Chambers where they forced the unnamed individual to testify as a fake victim of the shootings, under the threat of being arrested for prostitution and escort services and charity fraud, for the purposes of garnering an easy conviction against alleged shooter James Holmes. But not before being shot by the police chief in “non-life-threatening areas” of the body, according to the motion, to appear as having been shot by James Holmes himself. The motion also claims that it is likely some of the victims in the theater were merely paid actors working on behalf of the conspirators" Quoted from The Examiner: Friday's report by the online version of Denver's Westword Magazine details shocking claims made by, what appears to be, a new victim in a case that has throttled a community still in mourning over the tragic events. According to the court documents an individual, whose name has been officially redacted from the documents, came forward to file a “Motion to Intervene” for the right to be reasonably heard under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (a)(4), for the purposes of presenting newly discovered evidence to the court.
Corroborating much of a recent Conspiracy Examiner story maintaining the situation as potentially being another horrific (rogue government faction) conspiracy and possible false-flag event, the newly discovered evidence, thrown out of court by Judge William Sylvester days later, details stunning accusations against billionaire Philip Anschutz, Police Chief Dan Oates, Arapaho County Dist. Atty. Carol Chambers and, according to the alleged victim, the Illuminati as being potential co-conspirators in the crime.
The stunning accusations, dated August 27, reveal a startling story by the claimant as having been visited at home by police chief Dan Oates and Dist. Atty. Carol Chambers where they forced the unnamed individual to testify as a fake victim of the shootings, under the threat of being arrested for prostitution and escort services and charity fraud, for the purposes of garnering an easy conviction against alleged shooter James Holmes. But not before being shot by the police chief in “non-life-threatening areas” of the body, according to the motion, to appear as having been shot by James Holmes himself. The motion also claims that it is likely some of the victims in the theater were merely paid actors working on behalf of the conspirators and wants multiple individuals involved in the situation to take polygraph tests to prove their innocence.
Claiming that their conscience will not let fraudulent testimony contribute to an improper conviction of James Holmes, the new mystery victim asked that the judge submit the case to the FBI and the US Congress for further investigation into the alleged conspiracy. The judge, however, instead of taking a closer look, decided to strike down the motion as fraudulent, claiming the motion as likely being forged by an individual or individuals unassociated with the events. The judge also suggested the situation be investigated by the Arapahoe County Sheriff's office and those responsible for the motion be taken into custody by the Arapahoe County Department of Human Services and “referred to the appropriate mental health agency.”
But it may in fact be the judge that needs the mental attention as all the evidence collected in the case thus far seems to point toward mostly agreeing with the individual who filed the claim, despite the media and the court's attempts to suppress any evidence that doesn't support the official story. Multiple and corroborating eyewitness testimony stated what appeared to be multiple individuals involved in the shooting, including supporting official dispatch audio. Individuals interviewed by local media immediately after the event also claimed to have seen teargas canisters being deployed in the theater simultaneously from two different directions, in addition to side-by-side images of James Holmes prior to the shootings and the orange haired individual taken into custody as the alleged lone gunmen after the event looks startlingly like two different individuals. There also seems to have been two different gas masks found at the scene, in addition to other damning evidence that doesn't jive with the official version of the events.
The individual who filed the motion also added that they wanted their portion of the charity to be donated to James Holmes' prison commissary, after using the money to find Mr. Holmes “real” attorneys who are actually willing to act in the honest defense of James Holmes.
The motion, as certified by the Arapahoe County Dist. Atty. And public defenders offices, was sent via the United States Postal Service, then was quickly denied and subsequently released days ago to the public for reasons yet to be determined.
Perhaps one of the most telling aspects of the circumstances, however, happens to be the creepy dead silence about the motion by the media, especially considering every little detail about a situation like this is normally scrutinized at every angle after being groomed with a fine tooth comb and examined under a microscope.
Here is the related Aurora post, bumped to the top for reference:
All the evidence behind why I believe no one died at the theater
Inconvenient people the government wanted dead were most likely shot at locations other than the theater and blamed on HolmesJim Stone, August 22 2012 If you listen to the mainstream press, and even the alternative press, both state that people died at the bat man shooting. I now believe that people probably did die, but not at the theater. I believe that a drill took place at the theater, and inconvenient people the government wanted eliminated were murdered elsewhere and blamed on the bat man shooting. This is in contrast with my earlier posts, where I believed no one died at all. But new evidence has surfaced which includes the nurse who drowned in a lake near her home after tending the injuries of one or more of the victims. Regardless of what you have been told about bird shot, bloody little girls, people hitting the floor, etc take a look at what is here, and consider the evidence. First, the easy stuff. At no point did we ever get any CCD footage out of the theater. None for the emergency exit, none from inside the screening room, none from the lobby, none from the parking lot, we got NADA. None from a cell phone cam, absolutely NOTHING. Furthermore, the theater was a very nice modern theater which would have had those things in working order, and what about the mall itself? No footage from the mall either? Think about that. Why not? On top of that, we got no pictures after the fact from the inside of the theater. NONE, NADA. No bullet holes, no gas canisters, no shell casings, no blood on the floor, NOTHING. Why not? On the outside of the theater, in the back, there was blood on the sidewalk. But there is one problem with it. First and foremost, the spatters were CLEAN. NO FOOTSTEPS in them. People with some exposure to forensics who have posted on my forum have said that at crime scenes the blood ALWAYS has footprints in it, because it is impossible to stay away from it. Purportedly the blood on the ground was from someone carrying the little girl. In that case, whoever was carrying her would have stepped in the blood while carrying her, leaving bloody footprints and there were NONE. Furthermore, the blood spatters lead TOWARD the emergency exit, not away from it. The only way these two things could coincide is if a setup team laid the blood scene out and screwed up doing it. This scene could have happened as photographed only if the blood was in a container at the end of a handle, keeping whoever was dumping it on the sidewalk far enough away to not get it on themselves or walk in it. Stupid as they were, they started in the parking lot and worked their way toward the door, rather than starting at the door and working their way out into the parking lot. It's obvious in the following two photos.
So we have photos of blood outside, but none from inside. Perhaps because the theater owner did not agree to having a setup crew make a mess of his carpet.Another thing that should be easy for most people to grasp that it was only a drill is the fact that the police tapes show that the police were discussing where to put the victim's families and press for photos, WHILE THE SHOOTING WAS IN PROGRESS. At that point they would be clueless as to who the victims families even were, or how to get ahold of them, let alone GET THEM TO THE THEATER AT MIDNIGHT. In fact, why would the families even go to the theater? would the hospital be a better place for that? or do families let Bobby bleed out before getting into the ambulance just for a photo op? This simple statement in the police tapes proves it was all a pre planned setup, with the families and press already on scene before it even started. If you have been bamboozled into believing people died in that theater, you really need to look at the evidence and switch on your B.S. detector. Now that we have discussed the obvious, let's talk probabilities. Two of the victims hit the social security death index before the others. They were Jessica Redfield/Ghawi and Alexander Teves In the case of Jessica redfield, who I have no doubt is sipping on a pina colada somewhere after a multi million dollar payout, we have a damning tweet where she was laughing about making people believe there is gunfire. Right from her twitter account. I found this during a deep dredge of the evidence. Getting stuff like that is what I am known for. Ok, now that we have seen this tweet, let's talk about the other mass shooting Jessica supposedly witnessed. Supposedly Jessica Redfield, a budding media presense, was in Toronto during a mass shooting there in a mall only a month before being "killed" in another "mass shooting". First of all, if she really did witness a mass shooting in Toronto a month before this tweet, why would she laugh? Pehaps if THAT shooting was fake as well? You don't laugh about things like that. Second of all, figure the odds. Mass shootings happen about once every five years across the total population of the U.S. and Canada of approximately 370 million combined. With mass shootings occuring once every five years in that big of a population, witnessing two in such a short time span is technically impossible. Let's do a little math here. She gets the first one FREE. So over the course of your lifetime there will be a total of 80 years divided by five, or 16 mass shootings. If 150 people witness each one, that's 16X150 or 2,400 possible witnesses. 370 million divided by 2,400 is a 1 in 154,000 chance of witnessing ONE mass shooting. Now let's figure the odds of witnessing a second one. Take that 154,000 and multiply it against itself. That equals 1 in 23 billion (23,710,000,000) and that does not factor in the fact that the two shootings were so close. So we have two damning things against Redfield, the tweet and those odds. How about a third little tidbit? In her tweets, she talked about moving into a new place with 7 swimming pools and a lake two weeks before the second shooting. She was an intern. How does an intern accomplish that? Perhaps a multi million dollar payout? If I had no morals, I'd love that job. 7 pools and a lake would be great for laying low until things settle down. After that, a facelift and a life in politics, because you proved your ability to keep your mouth shut about corruption. Now on to other improbablilites. When doing a search of the names from Aurora on even a small search engine a week after the shooting, ALL VICTIMS FROM AURORA HAD: 1. A complete shutout of the first 50 hits on even a small search engine, as proven by this photo. Search engine hits
2. A memorial page on facebook.
3. A donation page, in their honor on facebook. Let's contrast that with a real murder scene, the Sikh temple shooting. 2 of the people shut out the first 10 hits on Google, and one of them was the father of the Emmy award winning director Arm Kaleka, who was producing a major disclosure movie about government corruption, stealing of energy technologies, and hidden contact. These hits were because the alternative press covered the story. The others who died did not show up on Google at all. Arm Kaleka had received numerous threats that if he did not stop producing the movie, members of his family would be killed. NONE of the people at the Sikh temple had a facebook page set up in their honor, nor were any donation pages set up. And attributing this to culture is not good enough, because Sikhs attend Bat Man movies, and not EVERYONE at Aurora would have put up a facebook page in the honor of their lost loved one. It just does not work that way unless it's all a pre planned psy op. These pages were made ahead of time, before the shooting and were simply posted at the "appropriate" time. Let's look at the difference between the photos coming out of Aurora which was fake, and the Sikh temple where people actually died: Now onto the harder details. Let's look into this nurse who died in a lake near her home after tending to the injured from the "bat man shooting". I will tell you where the 10 victims who did not make the social security database early most likely came from. But before doing so, consider this - If the bat man shooting really happened, why would you need to kill a nurse who tended the victims? Anyone who actually got shot in a theater would not know what was going to be said, they would just say it like it was, and there would be no reason for the media to differ on those details and no need for a coverup. But WHAT IF: What if they staged a phony bat man shooting to frame up Holmes so he would be facing a death sentence at the same time his dad was going to hang the bankers with his testimony at the Libor scandal hearings? What if THEY wanted real bodies? Why have ANY of them come from the theater? Why not just get rid of incovenient people to maximize the benefit from the staged event? If a nurse spoke to someone who was dying, and that dying person,who (for example) had the goods that could have jailed a state senator said something like "I was just getting out of my car after picking up a pizza, was grabbed and shot and now I am here" THAT would be worth killing her for. Consider the fact that 9 of the "hijackers" from 9/11 were alive later, and consider the fact that representatives from our own governement flew to Egypt and apologized on national television there for this "screw up". The video works, if Youtube says it does not, just click the link above. Youtube often blocks embedded videos on this site:
Consider the fact that NONE of the supposed hijackers were on the boarding logs for the airplanes. There is also no record of any of them even having tickets. And then, ask yourself, if there were 19 hijackers and 9 of them were found alive, WHERE DID THE OTHER ONES GO, IF THEY WERE NOT ON THE PLANES?911 may parallel Aurora in this way, with the exception of the fact that in the case of 911, someone screwed up and as a result some of the patsies lived. Since the elite have proven that they will vanish people in the name of a psy op as they did on 911, why would Aurora be any different? I believe the bodies they came up with to tag on the bat man shooting were inconvenient people the government wanted eliminated. Once they hit the hospital or coroner's office shot full of holes, who is to say WHERE they really came from before arriving? This would explain WHY: There was no CCTV or cell phone footage;
No pictures from inside the theater after the fact;
Why the blood spatters were clean and went the wrong way;
Why the police were talking about where to put the families and press WHILE IT WAS HAPPENING
Why the photos of the mourning family members looked like actors,
How Jessica Redfield witnessed the highly improbable two mass shootings in 1 lifetime,
Why Jessica Redfield hit the SSI database early, after moving to "7 pools and a lake",
The damning tweets,
The dead nurse,
The perfect shut outs on Google and other search engines (IMPOSSIBLE),
WHY the Aurora victims ALL got facebook profiles and donation pages in their honor while the Sikhs got NONE,
AND the fact that there really may have been dead bodies. The fact that the bankers benefited so much from this alone is damning in and of itself; and really, if people did or did not die in the theater the point is irrelevant when even a drugged llama would be able to see that both of these shootings were government staged, the first to save the bankers, the second to shut down the release of a damning disclosure movie, and BOTH serving the purpose of restricting or banning guns. And if you can't agree with me that it's highly probable that no one died in that theater, at least you should be able to see the other motives. No matter what, neither of those shootings were as seen on TV.
The police tapes are still linked farther down this page, the one of greatest interest is the final one.8/4/2012
Shooting "victim's" tweet throws poison on official storyJessica Ghawi, one of the "victims" of the Batman shooting had a different name on Twitter. That name is Jessica Redfield. And here is one of her tweets!!!
Why the creepy Buahahahahah response?
Another detail which relates to the above tweet - she was supposed to have witnessed another shooting at a mall in Canada the month before. Said tweet would be an indication that it's an inside joke, anyone tweeting her, knowing her, would never have put the quote in that perspective unless the Toronto shooting was fake as well, and he knew about it! The odds just do not stack in favor of the "official" story - such a response from her would NEVER have happened if she really bore witness to another shooting a month prior. She's fake, and she is laughing about it.
Here is her twitter account: GUNFIRE??!!??
"Make up" shooting at Sikh temple in Wisconsin was probably due to this discovery by this web site severely damaging the entire bat man storyThe Libor connection did not do the Bat Man shooting story line a whole lot of good either!
MORE TO COME, I have additional goods on this woman that are being ironed out. Seems like she may have received an ENORMOUS payoff for lying in Toronto, but there are many rabbit holes to find and flood. For starters, she was an intern, and after Toronto, moved to a new place with 7 pools and a lake! (possibly for hiding out after the next gig)
The Synchronicities are VERY WEIRD, FOR EXAMPLE:We had 2 Alexes, 2 Jonathans, A Jessica and a Jesse, and 2 Sullivans, who were NOT related in any way. Both deaths which actually showed up in the database were age 24. The database does not tell where deaths occurred, so they could have been registered in Sonoma County California for all we know.
Something else is VERY WEIRD. ALL THE NAMES EXCEPT FOR ONE, HAVE EITHER NO MATCH OR 1 MATCH THROUGHOUT ALL OF HISTORY. THIS MEANS THAT WHEN YOU SEARCH THE NAMES ON GOOGLE, INCLUDING MIDDLE INITIAL, THEY WILL BE THE ONLY ONES THAT EVER COME UP, TO CLARIFY SEARCHING AND MAXIMIZE PSYCHOLOGICAL IMPACT.
THIS SHOOTING WAS MAXIMIZED FOR PSYCHOLOGICAL IMPACT THE SAME WAY THE DATE 911 (AN EMERGENCY NUMBER) IS UNFORGETTABLEHere is how it went down, (or at least. it's a real safe bet).
"THEY" did not want competition in the search engines for their story. They wanted ABSOLUTE SHUT OUT searches, containing NOTHING other than what they wanted to have show up.
So they tasked a computer to do searches of a list/combination of names, until they came up with names that produced NO hits on google.
They then worked those names into the story, and Voila! PURE PSYCHOLOGICAL IMPACT WITH EVERY SEARCH.
It's as simple as that.
So in court, Robert Holmes, who was going to testify before Libor, now has a son with NO MEMORY of the shooting facing a death sentence at the MOST opportune time possible, for a crime that NEVER OCCURRED. But in the world of corruption, actors, and fake news, that won't matter. He will be punished as if it really happened and the bankers are now likely to RUN FREE.
I have screen captures of ALL RESULTS. IF YOU, THE ELITE, TRY TO FAKE THIS NOW, I'LL HANG YOU!__________________________________________
To clarify my position that the Bat man shooting may have never happened at all:The plot is ridiculous, and at a minimum the event was a false flag. To accomplish a political objective, it did not need to happen at all. Actors could have been in place across the board, and all the blanks filled in by a lying media. Got any other source for this than CNN and FOX? Did they post the police tapes? WHY NOT? I have presented some really good info here that tells a different story than you will find elsewhere. Perhaps there were bullets fired in the theater. In that case, Holmes could not have possibly done it. The entire event was sanitized, there WAS a second shooter, and the following posts and articles, AND the police tapes PROVE IT. The fact that the police DID NOT pursue the other car leaving the scene would indicate that it was all supposed to be a DRILL and the second car was not part of that drill and was therefore permitted to leave, possibly with the real killers inside. Perhaps there was a drill at the same time a real black op shooting took place. Either way it was a false flag and Holmes is virtually assured to be innocent.
Holmes put on trial WAY TOO SOONJust about everyone knows the line "you have a right to a speedy trial". Fewer people know the line "you will be allowed time to prepare a defense". And in the case of Holmes, this did not happen. WHY?
When I first heard that Holmes went to court within three days of the shooting, I thought that it had to be for a bond hearing. Evidently it was not. Too many questions were asked, bond hearings are short, and if proper procedure had been followed what should have happened in the first court appearance?
Holmes would have been given an amount he had to put up for bail, or been told bail was denied and sent back to jail with a court appearance date a month from now, and if he plead that he needed more time than that to prepare a defense, more than a month would have been allowed.
This did not happen with Holmes, who has been held without bond, and the fact that he is being held without bond proves that he is being rammed through the court system post haste. And there is a reason for it. That reason is, that they want as many of the court proceedings AS POSSIBLE to go by, with Holmes still stoned out of his mind from whatever they drugged him with.
It is obvious that Holmes was heavily drugged before the shooting, and was in a total stupor when arrested; a condition which would have rendered him unable to do it. It is proven by the police tapes linked on this site that there was a second individual in the theater - a fact that got silenced, which means a total of THREE people were at the scene of the shooting: 1. Holmes, drugged out of his mind, sitting in his car, 2. The gunman who shot everything up, and 3, an accomplice to the gunman who opened the emergency exit door and let the gunman in. I think in the original plot (that is, if the shooting even happened at all, see below) Holmes was supposed to shoot up theater 9. There was a drill going on at the time of the shooting that matched the scenario, and that drill had theater 9 getting attacked as well. Nothing happened there.
A brown SUV fled the scene from behind the theater and the police did not pursue. I wonder why? Perhaps that boils down to the fact that that the chief of police was an import from New York, a city famous for major police corruption. It is also possible that the police knew they were doing a drill, and the brown SUV was not part of the drill, so why bother with it?
Had the shooting been real, the police most likely would have blown away Holmes as he sat in his car. Even a casual youtuber would know how trigger happy the police are by now - WHY is Holmes even alive? Was he totally zonked? Not even conscious at all when found?
And then there is another connection. The Libor connection. As it turns out, Holmeses dad was a programmer for Darpa and the credit reporting agency FICO. Rumor has it that his dad had the goods on the bankers, and was going to testify before congress and hang the bankers in the upcoming Libor scandal hearings.
So let's separate cold hard fact from rumor here, so we can know where this all stands:
FACT: Robert Holmes really did work for Darpa as a programmer and really is a senior programmer for Minneapolis based FICO, a company which specializes in credit reporting and has developed special computer algorithms (compliments of Robert Holmes, who wrote them). These computer algorithms were able to track the entire Libor scandal down to the names and addresses of the perpetrators, and deliver it to FICO in a neat little package that could hang powerful people.
Here is his linkdln account:
FACT: It is obvious that his son, James Holmes, was doing EXCELLENT in college, and showed up for an exam totally stoned out of his mind, and subsequently dropped out of college, all within a span of only two months. From brilliant straight A's in neuroscience to total stoner flunkie in only two months. Very fishy.
FACT: James Holmes had never touched a gun in his life, knew nothing about them. Supposedly then, from that position, he skillfully booby trapped his apartment while totally stoned out of his mind and ordered an arsenal and paid for it with his credit cards and successfully operated the weapons the first time he ever touched them, well enough to totally shoot up a theater.
Hmmmmmmm . . . . I will tell you from experience, that if you NEVER shot a gun in your life, and then had to use SEVERAL to pump off hundreds of rounds YOU COULD NOT DO IT. Guns are not the hardest things to use, but to do that across several the first time you ever tried to use a gun, and have all of them work is a joke of reason. I remember buying a semi auto .38 handgun once and it took me 20 minutes to figure out how to load it and fire it because the entire top of the gun had to be slid back to allow access to the chamber, and I had never seen that before. THAT is after having MAJOR experience with long rifles. I felt stupid of course, but it did happen. Operation of a new weapon is not always obvious, and from a point of no experience with ANY gun, Holmes would never have figured out 3 in the course of 90 seconds.
THE BAT MAN SHOOTING STORY READS LIKE SOMETHING AN ELITIST IDIOT WOULD WRITE - someone who wrote fiction and had no real knowledge of the variables at hand. A colorful story, to be sold to the masses.
FACT: The entire theme of the bat man movie that got "shot up" involved the villain BANE, who was on a quest to imprison the elite of Gotham, who had ripped the common people off with scams, and Bane wanted to hold them accountable before the people. The parallel to Libor and Goldman Sachs was obvious. What a great theme to have, IF the father of the man who did the bat man shooting really was going to appear before Congress as a key witness who could name names and addresses of the bankster perpetrators of the Libor scam.
FACT: Someone held the emergency exit open, to allow the shooter in, and no alarm sounded. ALL emergency exits are alarmed, and the theater was NOT a poorly maintained piece of trash. Furthermore, ALL theaters have CCTV cameras in them. Why are we not being allowed to see the footage from the emergency door, the INSIDE of the theater, or out in the parking lot? No CCTV footage? Why? Could it be that it was OBVIOUS in the footage that Holmes just sat there in his car, in a drug induced stupor while a pro shot the place up?
FACT: Holmes knows NOTHING about the shooting and is suffering from amnesia. A good indicator of being drugged, and also a good indicator that it was nothing but a drill and he is being held in court under entirely false pretenses. All it takes is actors when the "suspect" has no memory. With regard to the drugging, please read the second link below; I really think that writer NAILED IT.
UNCONFIRMED: Robert Holmes had been called before Congress to testify for the prosecution in the LIBOR scandal.
To the unconfirmed note, I will post these two links and simply state that I absolutely believe this, but cannot confirm it:
Here is a careful take: Careful take
And Here is one that takes chances with accuracy, but I really believe this is EXACTLY WHAT HAPPENED, though it is unconfirmed: Take this creativity to the bank, I bet this guy nailed it!
Addressing the second shooter - An alternate take on HolmesIn the original scenario, the original report, a second shooter shot up Theater 9. That was probably the one Holmes was supposed to hit. And though I do not believe anything happened other than a drill, I am posting this alternative scenario because there is some evidence to support it.
There are some inconsistencies in the initial reports that leave room for an alternate scenario. Of course, this has all been buried since they ironed out the story for public consumption. In the original scenario, there was a second shooter and bombs in theater 9. So Holmes may have been given that one to do, but did not. This alternate take puts that possibility into perspective
The alternate take is,
He met people he thought were friends. They drugged him over a period of time - this can be easily accomplished by spiking food and drinks.
He goes into a black hole haze, and during this time, his hair gets dyed, and they work on him HARD to get him as nutty as possible while stoned. This likely took place over a course of days, during which his apartment is set up with tons of booby traps by a pro who actually would know how to do it, while Holmes, who is living away from people who knew him, people who would know something was fishy with him not being around for days, gets the workover at another location
A package is mailed in the name of Holmes, with all kinds of nutty stuff in it,
They set up the hit.
He sits out in his car and drools through the whole thing because he is stoned, and they could not get him to actually do the shooting.
A well trained hit man, who knows all about the weapons goes in and really does shoot up theater 8.
He takes off in a brown SUV (this was recorded)
Witnesses say the gunman in the theater looks nothing like the patsy, (this happened, but will probably devolve as witnesses are worked on during cross examinations)
Police come, the patsy has been pre programmed to say he did it, (he is still just sitting in the car drooling, that's where they found him)
He takes the rap
That's the alternate scenario. And it could explain why NO ONE got any video, not even the CCTV cameras in the theater. It's all just a black hole. NOTHING came out of that theater. That alone is fishy.
You mean to tell me, that during the opening premier of Bat Man, NO ONE WAS SITTING THERE WITH A CELL PHONE RECORDING IT? Come on now, people do that all the time! And by default they would have captured the shooting, without even thinking about it!
NO VIDEO OUT OF THERE? YEAH, RIGHT!!!
And you are NOT EVEN SUPPOSED TO TALK ABOUT IT!!!
Don't think it's possible for them to Wag the dog with the entire thing? Read this!
CNN caught RED HANDED faking the newsTake a look at this video. CNN is FAKING A NEWS REPORT.
I just hate that agency, which I cannot call news, Oh, the Creative News Network.
LIARS. LOOK AT THIS!
Attn, Youtube has a new censorship method. If the embedded video does not work, you can bypass the censorship by Clicking through to it here insteadI had people e-mail me saying this video was "removed by the user". Well, Youtube has a censorship method which makes the video look normal to those who posted it, and to those who embed it, but denies viewing by people who visit web sites by saying the video has been removed. That happened to this video. It's alive and well. So this video is important to them.
And down the page a ways at Youtube, there is a comment - This video is not translated correctly, I speak Arabic. Well, that's a lie, because in Arabic he asks for gunfire, the translation says "just tell him to shoot", he fires one shot, and the news reporter does not jump, he just gets confirmation that the background gunner can get the message.
Furthermore, they are right in the middle of Isha prayer, as evidenced by the soundtrack and you won't have that if everything they mentioned later in the newscast really happened, the mosques would be shuttered and silent, with people praying in their homes.
In Arab countries, the mosques all play the prayers over loudspeakers that are mounted high up in the minarets, and can be heard for very long distances. So you can hear several of these mosques in the broadcast. The fact that this was going on in the background proves that it was business as usual that day, and that this video really was as presented - a TOTAL FRAUD. Towards the end he gets connected and look at what they broadcast!
Ok, here is another video. This one focuses more on Aljazeera. Aljazeera was set up by the Rothchilds, it came out of London, and is a zionist news channel which serves to make the Arabs believe they have mainstream representation. Of course, Aljazeera is not as stupid with Arab issues as CNN, because Arabs know too much about their own world. SO Aljazeera is tuned perfectly to make Arabs believe they have representation, while dis informing them as much as possible. This is an important video:
I am holding my ground about Aurora being a wag the dogI have received several e-mails now, where people claim to have been witnesses. My take on those mails? First of all, my sites combined only get about 500,000 page views a month. So there is no way so many people from a small community would EVER find my site - 500,000 / 8,000,000,000 people. That calculates down to a 6.25 to the negative 5th power chance that ANYONE who witnessed the Aurora shootings would ever find my site to send me a mail telling me they saw it all. To get several mails means all are b.s.
They have the elitist catch phrases in them, which I am familiar with. That's a red flag. Also, consider the first two videos I posted at the top of this page, which PROVE the media fabricates news. Also, consider the police tapes linked below. And most of all, when you see those photos now of bloody little girls with their feet blown off, I ask you to FIRST send those photos provided by the MSM through the crap filter, after the alternative press caught them red handed using the injured face of a man killed somewhere else in the Arab world and copying those injuries to the face of Osama for mass consumption:
And that's my final answer!It does not have to be real to accomplish a gun grab if the masses fall for it.
Consider this article as well! I STRONGLY recommend you read this article. Scroll down to it, the tops of Whatreallyhappened pages are long.
THE FOLLOWING ARTICLE caused an ENORMOUS number of attacks against this site
Police radio communications CONFIRM - Bat Man shooting STAGED, PHONY, A DRILL.I have received two e-mails from people saying that witnesses to the shooting posted their accounts of it at a game forum and at Yahoo answers. I am not changing my take on this, and here is why - It's because the CIA hired over a million goons to go around the social forums re-enforcing stories like this and spread disinfo. If there ever was something that said it's all fake, it's the look on the face of the shooter afterward, and the photo op photo farther down this page. I don't buy it, and even if I am wrong about this and there really was action the rest of the story does not wash, this event was staged, pure and simple. And either way, these police tapes are worth a listen, because they have details which do not match the whitewash in the press. No shootout with the Joker and the police afterward? GET REAL.
In THE FIRST intercepted police radio tape, (which is silent for the first 11 minutes, indicating nothing was being said for those 11 minutes) at minute 11 the police units involved in the drill check in, and say all are present. Then, right around 13 minutes it is discussed where one of the centers will be. Then, starting at minute 14, they are discussing where they will be at the Aurora mall for the start of the drill at the Aurora theater.
I then skipped to the last of these, where they are talking about setting up the press, where to put the ambulances, where to put the "victims" families, etc for their photo ops. This MP3 has the police communications in the left speaker, overlapped with the Fire department communications in the right speaker It's OBVIOUS what is going on here. Keep in mind, that because this is a drill, bodies and injured WILL be mentioned and played as real, but it's ALL FAKE as confirmed by recording 1, and the overall attitude in this MP3, where they are talking about WHERE TO PUT THE PRESS AND FAMILIES AND AMBULANCES FOR PHOTOS!
My original suspicions were confirmed by these tapes. The bat man shooting NEVER HAPPENED AT ALL! These MP3's were posted by Wellaware1.com, which is begging people to download these and re-post them elsewhere so they do not get shut down. So these are coming off my servers now. I suggest you download them from here to distribute the server load, (I have headroom to spare right now) but if there are any problems they might still be at the source. And I thank Wellaware1.com for sticking their necks out to spread the truth. Here are ALL files from Aurora. The first and last are linked above (as well as down here), those are the ones I took a peek at.
I took more of a look at these than I planned to. It is mega obvious the drill was not even of primary importance to the police department, it's just a side thing.
1. Setting up the drill
MANY THANKS to forum member Kwai_Chang for linking to Wellaware1.com in the forum, absent that I would have never found this.
Bat man shooting CONFIRMED a wag the dogThere are serious problems with the story surrounding the "shooting" in Colorado.
There is no evidence being presented of: DEAD BODIES, A SHOT UP THEATER, NO CCTV FOOTAGE, RIDICULOUS PLOT (How does an unemployed college student get ahold of $20,000 worth of extremely controlled military gear) or anything else he had. You don't need any dead bodies to put an ambulance on camera and have a dozen or so actors cry for a camera. Why ONE BIG AMBULANCE, not many? Easier to manage. Cheaper. WHY were the police there INSTANTLY? This is a WAG THE DOG, COUNT ON IT!!!
And in the end, it will work JUST AS WELL. AND, why this shooting, so close to the previous in Colorado? Not plausible either, unless you have a community there that has been assigned by the power elite to pull these stunts. I do not believe it ever happened. PROVE ME WRONG. Oh, the elite stronghold under the Denver airport - the new base for everything. Cute. Consider that as well.
SO far documented, 1 ambulance 1 fire truck, several police, one Joker getup, a shirt with a bullet hole and a total of about a dozen crying people in photos. No stretchers, No CCTV footage, NO shot up theater pics, No bodies being carried out, NO pictures of people with any bandages or injuries present, NOTHING. This is a lazy cheap fake at best, being rammed down the throat of the public by a scamming media. And after being quickly nailed by viewers of Aljazeera, and having people point out immediately that the dead osama photo published in the U.S. was fake, it seems they did not want to take chances with stock photography and therefore we are seeing NOTHING OF PROVABLE SUBSTANCE.
"No plane theory" anyone? Possibly rightfully so!
Looking over the pictures published thus far, it really does look like a mega stupid fake once you realize the things I mentioned above. Capture this moment, because if people wake up to this they will have countless fake photos made to order. For now, they are resting easy.
And I strongly urge you to watch the following movie trailer for Wag The Dog, so you understand the concept and realize how easy something like this shooting can be faked.
And, by request, here are the screen captures
What it looks like when my site gets attacked |
ArchivesMy writing did not start with this site. I will fill in history over time by posting previous articles here
Prior to the Fukushima war disaster, this was a photography site.
These were old non-news articles, from the ancient days, originally used to drive traffic to the photos.