Fukushima may in fact have been caused by an act of war under the cover of an environmental disaster.
It took them three hundred years and trillions of dollars to build a theatre of darkness, yet the light of only one match can burn it down. Do not let this light go out. Archive and POST!
DEAR NHK NEWS IN SENDAI JAPAN, If you really cared about the Japanese people, you would have shown them THIS picture of reactor 3
This report is based on official records and evidence which cannot be silenced. The whole truth could not be definitively dug up with 9-11, but this was NOT the case with Japan's disaster.
3/11 was Japan's 911, it's all documented folks!
The shills can't discredit this report, so now they are claiming I stole it! Please consult This image and the Wayback machine
Jim Stone, Freelance Journalist, FIRST PUBLISHED MAY 21 2011 Updated Sunday April 15, 2012
This is a massive report. If you have troubles understanding it, just look at THIS picture of the vanished reactor, THIS picture of the destroyed facility and THIS picture, of Magna BSP's camera. Then scroll down to the photos of the NON EXISTENT quake damage and seismic charts which prove there was no 9.0 and therefore the very real tsunami could not have been natural. The fact that what happened in Japan did not occur naturally has been very well documented by a skilled investigator, who spent hundreds of hours getting to the bottom of this story.
NEW INFO: Japan offered to enrich uranium for IRAN!
This report uses classified leaked high resolution photos of the destruction of Fukushima, schematics for Fukushima and the original seismic records to support it's claims.
1. Reactor 3 is completely missing, which means the press and anyone who
has claimed anything about pressures, temperatures, containment, ect
about reactor 3 after March 14 are lying and people need to pay
attention to it, because failure of the public to realize the massive
extent of the lies about what is going on there will leave the door open
to a repeat event.
2. Reactor 4 is Building 7, demolished by explosives.
Reactor 4 had been defueled and was undergoing replacement of it's internal stainless steel shroud, yet blew it's containment anyway. That is
the FINAL smoking gun, an empty reactor is inert, and cannot produce an
explosion, yet one happened at 4 that was so powerful it destroyed the structure leaving it in danger of falling over. Overheated open fuel pools cannot produce hydrogen because
in an open fuel pool the water boils off at 100 Celsius, and won't be
present in pressurized form at 2,000 degrees Celsius to liberate it's
hydrogen by losing it's oxygen to the zircon cladding in the fuel rods.
The rods will prefer the free oxygen in the air and burn long before
attempting to claim the oxygen in whatever humidity there might be. Because fuel rods only contain 20 percent fissionable material, they also cannot produce the "prompt criticality" "The most qualified nuclear engineer in the world" Arnie Gundersen has spoken of. I got to the bottom of the Arnie Gunderson story, and added the results of that investigation further down the page. He has been put on a pedastal and pumped up enormously by a press that wants a misleading story, all the while he is a despised outcast of the greater engineering community. The explosion at #4 was flatly
impossible absent the use of an explosive device, and as a result the disaster at Fukushima is FAR FAR WORSE than ANYTHING Gundersen is willing to say. Gundersen is towing the line and hiding the true magnitude of what happened there because if it became widely known serious questions would be asked. When have you heard Gundersen talk about a totally missing reactor?
Reactor 4's dome was removed for defueling.
Drone photos prove it. This dispels the rumors surrounding unit 4's
explosion. Some people have said that this reactor was secretly in
operation to enrich plutonium. This photo proves it was disassembled for shroud replacement as stated.
Tepco is going out of it's way trying to explain the explosions, especially at reactor 4, because they did indeed occur, so an explanation is needed. As a result, they are giving reasons that cannot happen, just to say something. They need to see this post and get the Arava perspective(Arava is a district surrounding Dimona).
3. That the destruction of the facility is so severe it could only have been accomplished with nuclear weapons. Hydrogen produces a non-ideal subsonic explosion. It cannot turn concrete into dust. It can produce high pressures if sealed off, but the metal roof on all the reactor containments should have provided the relief and been the only thing destroyed. It takes a high intensity explosive to strip concrete off rebar, a blast wave many times faster than supersonic. This means that whatever happened at Fukushima did not have blast characteristics that fit the "official" story. If you missed it in the high resolution photo of the destroyed facility, I took a car that was laying around in the remains and placed it on top of one of the blown away walls at reactor 3, which clearly gives the reference that the walls had support columns at least 15 feet thick. Fukushima was built with the Mark 1 containment design, but beyond Mark 1 standards which was a common upgrade(reference is the included photos, it is obvious). It is true that gas explosions can be very destructive, but only in facilities that were not designed to handle them. Even the basic mark 1 containment was many times beyond capable of withstanding the worst hydrogen blast.
4. That nuclear weapon(s) were placed inside of the reactor containment(s) disguised as security cameras installed under contract this year by Arava based security firm Magna BSP (Arava is a district around Dimona, not a city.) Their "security cameras" weighed over 1,000 pounds and were the size and shape of gun type nuclear weapons.The reason Magna BSP gave for the odd shape, enormous weight, and giant proportions of their cameras was that they were stereoscopic. They have creatively called them bi-scopic so when you search on google their monstrous cameras are the only thing that comes up (outside of Dj lighting and a gun scope) Try it. Type "Biscopic camera" into google images,(without the quotes) it's a hoot! This helps marketing I guess. The need for such a large stereoscopic camera could be plausible at an airstrip, where the camera would need depth perception out miles, but not indoors where focal lengths are short. Other manufacturers have units appropriate for indoor focal lengths which are only twice the size of ordinary monocular security cameras. Depth perception going out miles could also be accomplished with two separately mounted cameras weighing only a few pounds; the giant thousand pounder is a dead giveaway. Magna does make passive radar systems which require a large body, but the owl could accomplish it's claimed function with two small lightweight cameras (5 or so lbs, not tiny) and the processor in a modern laptop. Why this giant thing? note - a not yet produced graphical model is what you see most on Google, the ones produced thus far are ugly boxes.
. . . . . . . . . .9/11, 4/11, 3/11? see a pattern? Let's not see a
6/11. Your time and effort in spreading the word may really make a
Due to the many positive e-mails about getting the truth out, rather than hold back I am going to put the original information back. It follows below.
The quake was not what we were told.
In fact, the quake was a bold faced lie, packing a political agenda. There is even more proof now, and it goes beyond the linked Japanese chart. This original seismic data is the smoking gun, however, I have something better. I finally suppressed the urge to vomit and analyzed the lies told by the USGS, and from them wrote this sad, sad story about how it really was, not what you will see in the video. Keep in mind that precise top speeds of flying debris cannot be determined with accuracy, but this story will at least be close to the numbers put out by the USGS.
The people in the newsroom did not die, this story is what would have happened if the USGS charts were true.
Meet Atsuo, Airi, and Akiyoshi. They were all the best and most dedicated people at the NHK newsroom, in Sendai Japan. Akiyoshi loved Airi, and Atsuo was the one who introduced them. Unfortunately, all 3 died in the quake. Akiyoshi got a severe cut and bled to death when he hit a display screen behind him at 44 miles an hour, and was then thrown out through a hole in a collapsed wall. Airi followed pretty much the same path, and died beside him in the rubble. Atsuo flew through the open door behind him, then crashed through a window and was crushed when he landed in a massive seismic crack in the road, which closed in on him. Others in the newsroom died also, but I never thought up names for them. At least, according to the official USGS charts. The laser printer was never found, but the table it was on ended up on top of the rubble, smashed to pieces, where one of the few survivors used a piece of the metal frame to splint his broken leg.
The video below is the one I pulled the frames out of for the sad, sad story. It is a video of a newsroom at the hardest hit area in Japan, and it SAYS IT ALL. This is when the quake was happening live. They are alarmed there is an earthquake, but most people stay seated in their chairs.
Some people even keep typing on their computers as the quake happens.
Also, note that most of the stuff stays on the desks, at the end, a laser printer is still sitting on a cheap table, ect. some things fall but things return to normal quickly, all the while the English announcer is reading a script of devastation with all the pep of some paid fool who does not believe what he is saying in a cheezy infomercial. The quake was significant, but only in a 6.0 sense, as recorded by the seismographs. This is important footage, because it proves the earthquake measured at a 6.8 was an instrumentation based richter reading. Confusion between the Shindo and Richter scale is being used to cover this up . I chose this video because it's location is documented to have been the worst affected, and was recorded in a news room with a known fixed location.
This video gets deleted from Youtube occasionally, if it does not work check back later when I have re-linked it.
Remember that this video is proof of what really went on. This means there never were significant aftershocks, never was a natural tsunami, and if they lied about that, what else? This video is pivotal and vital to exposing the truth. Sure there was a quake, but at this newsroom it was not much over a six if it even was a six. I chose this video because the news room is within eyeshot of station MYG012, which was used by the USGS to make these graphs which represent an 8.8, as was stated in this (English) newscast and was probably used as a guide to fudge the lie due to the closeness of the newsroom to the seismic station. Looking at these charts, it is super easy to get a rough guess at how fast people would have flown. 44MPH to the North, and 28MPH to the East. Those are not precise numbers but the charts are proven wrong by the video because according to the charts people should have entered uncontrolled flight. Here is the full chart put out by the USGS Of course, they offer no reading from MYG011, which was closest to the 9.0 "epicenter" by a long shot, because it only got a 5.63's worth of shaking. I will do that work for them. That map is below.
I challenge ANYONE to send me pictures of this quake showing me devastation in an area not hit by the tsunami. All we have, all the pictures are tsunami damage. Let's see pictures of quake damage. The Kobe quake was a 6.9/7.2 depending on source. That makes this quake, at a 9.0 100X as powerful. Sendai was near the epicenter and would have been devastated if it really happened. Look at the earthquake photos of damage from the Kobe quake, and try to find ONE THING SIMILAR in SENDAI. Just try. They do not exist. Outside of the tsunami, the quake which supposedly hit Sendai with many times the power of the one in Kobe, did not destroy a single building there. Sendai was only 48 miles from the epicenter of this "9.0" which would have devastated everything in an area 1,000 miles across if it was real. All of Japan would be toast. Try to find a photo of seismic damage in Sendai. I challenge you. Try to find it in any of the coastal cities, as little as 25 miles from the "epicenter". I looked for 5 hours, and except for some tanks that fell at a brewery not a single one exists. No pictures of collapsed skyscrapers or high rises equals NO 9.0. You will not find a single skyscraper photo where the windows got broken either. You will find no downed power poles, no flipped over cars, no uprooted trees, no derailed trains (except for one the tsunami hit), and the road damage is typical of even a 5.0. You will not find pictures of a single damaged multi story building or even a structurally damaged wood framed house outside the tsunami zone. In Sendai the quake messed up grocery stores and kitchens and that really is about it.
And now, I will say it like I knew it had to be.
I believe the phony 9.0 story was used as seismic cover for a tsunami nuke, which produced the tsunami of a 9.0 when detonated in the Japan trench (where no earthquakes of significance happen) as punishment for Japan offering to enrich uranium for Iran. The rest of the story, the concealment, is black ops. Bet on it. In the tsunami videos, the tsunami rips through pristine and undamaged cities, where business as usual is obvious and the tsunami is an ambush; not 9.0 earthquake ravaged debris. The quake is a paper thin story taped together by the undeserved trust of a gullible public. And the stories? The CIA did not hire a million people last year for nothing. If there is evidence of a 9.0 SHOW ME. A 9.0 will devastate an area over 1,000 miles across. That is how big a 9.0 is. The entire nation should be in ruins, especially judging from the damage the 6.9 Kobe quake did, and no where, no where outside the tsunami zone in the entire country is there a single damaged multi story building, a single collapsed bridge, a single structurally damaged wood framed house, or skyscraper. If a picture exists that can be definitively pinned to this quake, show me. The only collapsed structure in all of Japan was an old welfare shelter near station MYG004, the true epicenter.
Take a look at these frame captures, and ask a question - Why is no one trying to run? Why are the cars all just parked peacefully as the tsunami arrived? Why was there no warning? Why did the tsunami sirens only go off after the tsunami arrived? Could it be that the people and the governement had not felt a significant earthquake and did not measure one either?
Question: Why are none of the roads packed with people trying to flee the approaching tsunami?
Could it be that the people and government were not expecting one? Tsunami sirens blare only when it arrives, rather than 40 minutes before, which is how much warning they would have had if a real quake in the ocean had been detected. Consider that. Parking lots full of cars, everyone at work, no one trying to leave. AMBUSH!!.
When people keep typing at their keyboards during the quake, it's obviously not what we were told.
RUSH UPDATE, May 28
When reviewing the seismic data for the supposed 9.0, I knew there were instead 3 small simultaneous inland epicenters. This made me suspicious right from the start that the quake was artificially triggered and used as seismic cover for a tsunami bomb. But I needed a reason to believe an artificial quake could have been done. I suspected that either Japan was testing nukes and Israeli intelligence was onto it and used the tests as the "start of clock" for their operation, or Israel managed to smuggle nukes into lava tubes and tunnels far underground to trigger earthquakes and contain the blasts. So I was hunting for tunnels and lava tubes near each of the three epicenters, and wanted to find them before writing this into this report. As it turns out, I did not need to. This military briefing with Secretary of Defense William Cohen, dated all the way back to 1997! shows that even then, Cohen knew about EM weaponry that could trigger quakes and set off volcanoes. I have ignored everything regarding this subject, I thought it was the realm of kooks. I thought EM weaponry would be effective in weather modification only, but I am not going to argue with the Secretary of Defense. There are obviously then, energy technologies which have never been publicized, such weaponry would need far more energy input than the electrical grid could provide. And the systems Cohen spoke of in 1997 would be outdated now.
Cohen stated: "Others are engaging even in an eco- type of terrorism whereby they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the use of electromagnetic waves. So there are plenty of ingenious minds out there that are at work finding ways in which they can wreak terror upon other nations. It's real, and that's the reason why we have to intensify our efforts, and that's why this is so important. - William S. Cohen, Secretary of Defense, April 28, 1997. Left unsaid by William Cohen is that such systems would be developed by DARPA and owned by America first!
I would expect with 14 years of advancement that these technologies could now trigger devastating earthquakes in non-seismic zones. Bejamin Fulford, an experienced Journalist with a long history and a paid access site, is predicting that the floods along the Mississippi are in fact caused by Haarp, which will then be followed by a manmade earthquake along the New Madrid fault, and then a subsequent attack at 15 reactors in the nation's agricultural heartland. If this is so, it will make Fukushima look like a cake walk. I myself have verified that the Siemens SCADA system Stuxnet targets has been used to replace the old control systems at a majority of American nuclear facilities. It is therefore important for people to SPREAD THE WORD. They have already started with the flooding, which is phase 1. Phase 2 will be the earthquake, destroying levees and totally unleashing the raging Mississippi. Phase 3 will be a virus attack at nuclear facilities. THE ELITE ARE COWARDS. IF THE WORD IS SPREAD SUFFICIENTLY, THEY WILL NOT DARE TO PROCEED TO PHASE 2 AND 3, Mold grows best in the dark.
The following picture is the strongest reading for this quake on any seismogram anywhere in Japan. This was before the lie machine got running smoothly. Early on there were a few sputters and this REAL chart got out. As you can see on this chart, it was a 6.67 on the Richter scale, (not shindo scale, confirmed by PGA reference) This would fit in with NO structural damage in Sendai and the level of shaking in the video
This quake was initially asessed a 6.8, and the seismic data will show anyone the epicenter was inland, not at sea.Please note - the date listed at the top is the date of compilation, Japan has thousands of seismic stations run by numerous organizations, and they take time to merge into one final report. That is the date listed at the top of this compilation (March 15), and there is a shill out there who can't figure this out, and can't make his way to the bottom of the report where the date of event is written; a fact which should be obvious because the main seismograph in this report is dated and timed to the quake, and is a match for the lower resolution seismograms in this large compilation. Furthermore, I linked the ENTIRE USGS report as well. So it started a 6.8, then got upgraded to a 7.9, then got upgraded to an 8.4, then got upgraded to an 8.8, then got upgraded to a 9.0, and had the epicenter put out in the ocean. Now many are saying it was a 9.1 which would bump up MYG011's number to 1200 from 1070, and it is all based on tsunami effects, not seismic data.
The following seismograms clearly show epicenters from 3 separate small quakes all occuring simultaneously. This is what would be expected of an attack, rather than a natural occurence.
One problem with people grasping how big a 9.0 is, is exponential charts which will hide how much energy is really being released behind confusing gradient marking. To answer the need for clarity, I got out the calculator and produced a chart that shows you how big a 9.0 earthquake is on a linear scale. Make sure you expand and scroll it, it is 5,000 pixels tall. Due to its large verticle height it opens on the left side of the screen and is almost invisible until you expand it. Confusion over how GIANT a 9.0 really is has helped the elite scammers enormously in their lie. There is simply no way much of anything will remain standing, yet as the tsunami rolls in . . . . . .
And now, I will bite. This is what I did not want to publish, but I know it has to be true. Call this creative journalism, because I never called Netanyahu, but here is the most rational conclusion I can draw, based on all info gathered so far including the original not faked seismic data.
I honestly believe Japan is being held a nuclear hostage. It all makes
1. Japan offers to enrich uranium for Israel's GREAT SATAN, Iran
2. Immediately, Israel sets up front companies masquerading as security companies, and one of them succeeds in getting a security contract at a Japanese nuclear facility. 4 months later the Dimona Dozen shows up, and under the cover of a security contract gets unlimited access to the heart of Fukushima. They plant the virus, install real cameras outside the
facility, and functional poorly disguised nuke cameras inside the facility. In addition to this, they install an unauthorized data connection to allow control of all the guts of the facility via the virus. (they admitted to this connection, as discussed later on this page)
3. After installing Stuxnet and the nukes they scram
4. Israel waits for one of the many natural quakes in Japan to provide
cover for a tsunami bomb, and they already have it at the bottom of the
Japan trench. VLF communications are established with the bomb to
penetrate the water. David in Dimona gets seismic reading from Japan.
6.67 in progress, BOOM. (new evidence shows the quake most likely was not natural)
Tsunami comes in, swamps stuxnet infected power plant, direct video feed
from legitimate cameras security company installed gets to David via totally unauthorized channel, and
David knows just when to cut the generators off. Others on the team do all they can to counteract measures taken by the employees at fukushima, who are unaware an attack is taking place and do not understand why everything is going crazy
5. Israeli Prime Minister calls Japan, and says TAKE THAT for offering
help to Iran, and ya know, there are FIVE MORE NUKES in the ocean off the
coast of Japan, and we are going to set those off and destroy your coastal
cities if you do not forget that 6.67, and say it was a 9 to cover for
tsunami effects. AND NOW we are going to make your people DEMAND you move
away from nuclear power so you can NEVER threaten us like that again. We
are BLOWING UP FUKUSHIMA DIIACHI and you are going to go along with
whatever story we tell you to. SO THERE!!
6. David and his pals close ALL valves to the reactors via the remote data
link they admitted to installing, and put them full throttle, to melt them
down while the virus keeps control room readouts displaying false info, like nothing is
going on even though the place is coming apart. After enough mayhem ensues to provide plausibility, they set off
planted nukes and blow the place sky high.
And even if the quake was real, there are nukes that can reach an 8.4. Close enough.
Though I have yet to work out the final details, I probably have enough to hang them because:
1. I got the real seismic data that proves beyond a doubt the quake is not what we were told and was in fact an inland 6.8, (calculated higher than the seismogram due to the triangulated true epicenter being a little higher) which would get noticed but not feared in quake ridden Japan.
2. Numerous referenced sources prove Stuxnet really was written by Israel
3. Japan really did offer to enrich Uranium for Iran, and Israel has been documented to have attempted to destroy the reactor in Iran, and probably did. Japan contributing to Iran's nuclear future would make them just as much an enemy to Israel as Iran. Israel would want them taken out.
4. It is documented that a team from Israel, with a history consisting only of working in Israeli defense, got unlimited access to a Japanese nuclear facility, which then went boom
5. Reactor 4 had been defueled and proven disassembled, and therefore no explosion there was possible. What should have happened at reactor 4, if anything at all? the fuel pools should have melted down and caught fire once the water boiled off from lack of recirculation AT Worst, and badly contaminated the containment structure, NOTHING ELSE. NO explosions, NOTHING ELSE. Reactor 4 is building 7, PERIOD. Why did an explosion there happen that was so severe it blew the outer containment walls (4 feet thick) and inner containment walls that were much thicker? Reactor 4 is reportedly now in danger of falling over. HOW?
6. The Japanese government is going along with the story of a scientifically proven false 9.0. There is a reason, and my guess is that Israel has made threats to wipe out Japanese coastal cities with additional tsunamis if the government of Japan speaks a word of what went on, there should be no reason for Japan to go along with this other than a continued threat.
Is it not interesting this "quake" reportedly happened at the bottom of the Japan trench, which would be perfect for hiding an atomic bomb blast?
Is the Department of Homeland Security trying to keep American industries (and nuclear facilities) in the dark about Stuxnet? After Fukushima fell victim to unwary operators, I would think such a conference would be a TOP priority here! The genie is out of the bottle. It is a fact that the writers of Stuxnet intend to use it. So cancelling a well researched conference about the vulnerabilities of the Siemens SCADA system to Stuxnet in the name of "keeping hackers from getting info" seems to me like an effort to keep the threat alive. Ignore the fluff at the beginning, and read the "About TakeDownCon" summary near the bottom so you know what they actually cancelled rather than settle for the no-panic fluff at the beginning. This is SERIOUS. I fear that by the time the Hacker Halted conference happens in October, the summer of disaster may have passed. And if it has not, I bet any discussion of Stuxnet at Hacker Halted will also be cancelled. Stuxnet is too good a toy for a very powerful group to let go of. Something is fishy here.
Other publications picked up this story now, and are poo pooing the issue into the ground. They are obviously attempting to morph responsibility for Stuxnet style attacks away from Israel so that they can regain cover and use the weapon as a false flag tool to destroy internet freedom. This is where they are going to go with this - count on it, and when the disasters happen there will be a cozy blanket of lies shielding Israel from all blame. Never forget, THIS IS THEIR BABY, NEVER FORGET. Prior to them doing this, WE NEVER HEARD OF IT.
About "prompt criticality" - As it turns out, Arnie Gundersen, mister "prompt criticality" with regard to the massive explosion at #3 is very poorly credentialed. His crowning achievement was playing with a 100 watt open water tank reactor in a classroom for a short period of time.
Fuel rods are only 20 percent fissionable, sometimes even less, and until
you reach over 90 percent purity in U238 and about 70 percent purity in Plutonium NO "prompt criticality" is possible in ANY case no matter how much of it you have laying around. Furthermore, even with 100 percent pure material you need a precision trigger
slamming or crushing material together to get a detonation. Even if 100 percent pure material is slammed together at high speed, if it is not done right you will get only a nuclear "sputter" that pushes the pieces apart, and no detonation. Nukes are hard to do! Why have so many of us seemed to have forgotten that nuclear detonations are hard to accomplish? The "prompt criticality" in spent fuel story is something I would have expected to hear from an Ewok praying to a gold robot. I can't believe even a scammer would have the guts to suggest it, let alone allow it to be spread around in his name. For an explanation for the explosions, just look at the cameras the Dimona Dozen brought in. If someone is waving a degree as an anchor for this "prompt criticality" bull hockey, remember that there is such a thing as a paper trained idiot and if you look into Gundersen's background you will discover he is barely that, with his ONLY hands on experience outside a classroom being an intern at a nuclear facility two years before he got his degree!
If the mainstream media wanted the facts, why did they pick this guy? Because he said what they wanted, truth be damned.
"We at Vermont Yankee are well acquainted with Arnie and his exaggerations. He plays to a public and a legislature that has zero knowledge of nuclear power or engineering and is willing to accept any negative claim as truth." And since he gave an impossible "prompt criticality" explanation which diverted attention away from the only real explanation for the magnitude of the explosion at #3 - a nuke, they gave him a ton of air. Enough said.
This post has been greatly improved via input from readers. If you have information proving any points wrong, or think something should be clarified, as well as new info that can further solidify the case, contact me. Thanks!
The following section covers the Fukushima disaster.
Published April 29, 2011
Fukushima was impossible. The swamping of the external generators by the tsunami was irrelevant, because the real emergency backup systems
are driven by steam from the reactors themselves. No electricity is
needed to operate three separate emergency systems at each reactor, each
of which will keep a reactor safe even if only one works. Interesting
it is then that all 9 non electrical backup systems across the three fueled reactors
failed. This is technically impossible outside of willful intent, and
was likely the result of a Stuxnet attack.
Stuxnet was designed specifically to target Siemens SCADA controllers
and is most effective at tampering with fluid control systems. The
centrifuges it attacked in Iran were ideal. So are the fluid control
systems at a nuclear facility. Oil refineries are equally at risk,
Stuxnet is most dangerous when affecting a system which needs to control
the flow of any liquid, be it hydraulic, for cooling, or combining
chemicals. Stuxnet is documented to have been produced by the Israeli Defense Forces, for the purpose of destroying any industrial system that can be destroyed by improper fluid flow.
Magna BSP, a Dimona based company with no history outside of IDF contracts prior to Fukushima has a suspiciously short domain history despite a 10 year claimed history.Magna BSP had a full time internet linked two
way connection to the Fukushima reactor room(s) all the way through the
disaster. They told TEPCO about that connection on March 15 (after
everything blew sky high) via an article printed in the Jerusalem Post.
Why did Manga BSP wait until everything was blown sky high to tell
Tepco the data link existed, and then did not tell them face to face?
I find it hard to believe that TEPCO would not have been interested in
viewing a reactor that was about to explode. It seems impossible that
Tepco would not have wanted to view the reactor, and probably did not
ask because the link was kept a secret. It is a simple fact that
internet connections are never allowed inside a reactor's containment.
The connection was mentioned in the Jerusalem Post AFTER the destruction
has two modes, random and administrative. It can be administered to
optimize the damage and can also transmit setup information and
industrial system information to a remote computer. Once installed on
the host system via a flash drive it causes that system to violate it's
normal security protocols and internet administration becomes possible
if a connection exists. Tampering is not visible on the control room
readouts, because Stuxnet learns what "normal" looks like and keeps the
temperature, pressure, and other readouts within normal limits so that
the operators are oblivious to the destruction happening in secret.
Stuxnet appeared in Japan in June of 2010,
shortly after Magna BSP arrived. Remote administration mode can be
adjusted on demand to suit any need. No doubt the people at Fukushima
sat there in idle mode thinking all was well until something screamed or
went boom and at that point it would be too late to do anything other
I am a lifer in the types of control systems Fukushima and it's clone,
TVA owned Browns Ferry have. BOTH have been upgraded to modern Siemens
controllers running the Supervisory Control And Data Acquisition
(SCADA) system Stuxnet was designed to attack; upgrades are the norm in
any major facility. On many blogs people say the controls were old and
therefore Stuxnet immune; they are out of touch or have no knowledge of
industrial control systems. I actually ferreted it out.
And now I will explain in detail why the problems before the explosions had to be sabotage
The diesel generators were not out in the open as we were led to
believe, they were in fact located in the basements of the turbine
buildings which were sealed off and never significantly flooded. One of
them stayed running the entire time, but the electrical switch gear
attached to it disconnected it for an unexplained reason which made it
useless. Each of the backup generators at Fukushima were capable of
running 14,000 households each, which means they had to be over ten
megawatts each. It is obvious then that Fukushima was set up to survive
on only ONE of 13 backup generators, and ONE did keep running. One
would be many times larger than needed to run last ditch backup systems
at all reactors, but would not keep business as usual. But that is not
the real story, which is that even others which were high and dry
stopped as well.
I hypothesize that the ONE generator that kept running was kept as a
lone reserve, never hooked up to a SCADA controller.
Why did the switch gear disconnect a working generator? That is the
type of thing Stuxnet was designed to do. On top of these things,
emergency generators arrived on scene within 9 hours, before anything
bad happened at all but were not able to provide power because the
switch gear would not let them. This deceptively written report
from the World Nuclear Association contains all this information, but
it is presented in a way which will cause you to overlook these things
if you are not careful while reading it. This report contains accurate
information presented in a very misleading way, which will protect the
liars who wrote it - they actually did speak the truth here but in a way
it would be missed by virtually anyone. Study the facts presented here
with the full ramifications of those facts in mind, not their shallow
From this report you can get:
1. The generators never got submerged - you have to connect the dot
between them being in a contained area and the tsunami thereby not
being able to get to them. Some water got into one of the the turbine
buildings where several were located and flooded the lowest point in
that building to a depth of 4 feet, which means that even if the
generators were on the floor at the lowest point they likely would not
have been swamped because they are too big - the water would not get
past the footings. Perhaps a one megawatt generator would have swamped;
certainly not one of the big diesels, which were, according to this
report enough to run 14,000 homes each. In addition to this, there were
several generators in a second location that never got flooded at all.
One of these generators kept running but was not able to get power into
the facility because the switchgear prevented it.
2. You have to have watched the robot videos, which clearly show the
switch gear that malfunctioned after the tsunami never got wet - there
was a non tsunami reason for the failure. Also look at the high
resolution photos referenced below. There is no switch gear for the
diesel generators outside the facility, it is all indoors in areas
higher than the water got. Remember that there was no emergency when
the off site generators arrived, which means that they could work
efficiently to get things up and running. With my experience in this
area, Assuming it DID get soaked, a complete replacement of high
capacity switch gear should only take an afternoon if done with an
emergency attitude. A truck mounted crane or a forklift does all the
heavy lifting and the stuff is modular. In every major facility there
are spares galore. It is not that hard to make the terminations. A
worst case scenario could have been addressed before things went
horribly awry, that is, unless a virus did not let the new switch gear
activate either. It would take days to conclude a virus was messing
things up. You would not expect that. I am sure there is a LOT we
never heard about.
3. That batteries held, leaving only a one hour gap in time where there
was no power present to run things before adequate off site power drove
into the facility on the road all nice and ready to hook up, but was
denied to by switch gear which this report says was swamped but that is
likely an assumption because swamped switchgear could have been replaced even before the batteries died. The fact that the offsite generators were able to
be driven into the facility also proves that other lies told about the
earthquake in general - employees leaving only to find cracks in the
road so bad they had to walk home; Why? Why lie like this? AT LEAST
this report has some modicum of honesty.
4. You have to look at the chart that shows the thermal output of the
reactors 8 hours after the earthquake, which is when the batteries
running the electrical cooling pumps died, the output at that time was
less than 20 megawatts from each reactor, which means that they would
not have had troubles before the off site generators were hooked up to
restore power if it was not denied by what I suspect was stuxnet
infected switch gear. The real critical time is in the first 3 hours
5. Reactor 3 exploded entirely, yet this reactor had the most functional
backup systems. At least this report says the explosion remains
"unexplained". Perhaps those who wrote the report should take a look at
this for an answer.
6. The reactors are stated to be an "early 1960's design" apparently to
mislead people into believing they were outdated even when installed.
This was not the case. Their design was an early 60's concept but in
fact a late 60's design, and since installation takes years, what more
could you expect in the early 70's? The reactors were in fact a very
safe design. This report at least states that the facility was very
well updated. Identical reactors at TVA owned browns ferry have been
certified safe and licensed to operate through the year 2035. These reactors were also converted over
to run the Siemens Scada system. The reactors at Fukushima were not
garbage. The fastest cars in production still function on a late 1800's
This report is perfectly inaccurate with regard to reactor 3
containment. Perhaps the people who wrote this report have not actually
looked at the facility or seen the confidential photographs.
supports what I have said here entirely. It was written by an
experienced reactor operator. I found this on May 10. I was absolutely
Each reactor has 8 separate emergency backup systems, each capable of saving the reactor on it's own. Three are designed to function perfectly if all power is lost and even the generators fail.
Fukushima did not need any electrical systems operating AT ALL to keep
itself from blowing up, when power is lost steam from the reactors is automatically diverted
from the generator turbines to two totally separate steam turbines
connected to totally separate water pumps needing only reactor steam to
power them. Even that backup system has dual redundancy, only one of
the two is needed for the job. But the valves which have to activate to
re-divert the steam, all 6 valves on a total of 3 fueled reactors, eventually
failed to. At reactors 1 and 3 these systems worked, but switched off at
reactor 1 within an hour and off at reactor 3 after running for more
than two days. No one has been able to explain why these systems
switched off all by themselves, when they need a powered command to
switch off. At reactor 2 they were never allowed to activate.
This can only happen if the control system tells them to shut off or
stay off, absent intervention from the controller they automatically and
seamlessly switch cooling modes to passive rather than electrical.
Some readers may remember that the real issue at Fukushima was
malfunctioning valves, and the need to get someone past the radiation to
open them. These are the valves that were spoken of. Because Stuxnet
kept the readouts normal, no one knew this system did not function until
major problems happened as a result flooding the area where the valves
are with radiation. This prevented last ditch efforts (running and
cutting the wires).
One automatic valve jamming and mechanically failing would be a
surprise,6 failing can only be sabotage.
addition to this, another completely independent separately piped backup
with an entirely different electronic decision tree which injects borated water at
a pre charged 3,500 PSI into the reactor to irrevocably shut down all
chain reactions (reactor rebuild required) also simultaneously failed at
all 3 fueled reactors. The borated water systems have explosive operated
valves so reliable that even one out of 3 failing would be a ten
thousand to one possiblity, if that. The reliability of the borated
water systems is technically theoretically assured. All three failing at
the same time at Fukushima can only mean sabotage.
High pressure in all of the reactors proves the quake did not damage any
of the infrastructure at fukushima because any leaks would have let
the pressure go. In addition to this, the seismic readings at Fukushima
were 6.07 Fukushima was designed to handle being at the epicenter of
The media keeps harping about how all the water went
away. It only did because these three backup systems were prevented
from cooling the reactor which caused the water to boil off and never be
replaced. High pressures were talked about constantly in the press;
This means beyond a doubt that all 6 steam powered backup systems were
intact, and all 3 borated water systems were intact also because if they
were not the pressure would have escaped through them. Absent
emergency backup control power keeping the virus alive; (control power
Magna BSP admitted was there the whole time by mistake when they said
their cameras and supporting computers captured the explosions and
maintained a data link) the valves which control these systems would
have opened when the generators failed and there would have been no
disaster. 3 worst case scenarios where all 9 automatic valves across
9 separate emergency backup systems are held shut by the controller
when no power should have been present to prevent them from activating
can only mean sabotage.
A historical perspective of Fukushima shows the hydrogen blasts were bogus.
Hydrogen blasts could not have damaged Fukushima so badly, this is a media fed lie.
If hydrogen gas alone mixed with air could produce blasts strong enough
to blow reactor containment buildings to pieces, which are among the
strongest structures on earth (exceeded in strength only by ones like
Hoover Dam,) then hydrogen gas filled bombs would be the prime military
option. In reality, the Three Mile Island incident proved
hydrogen ignition in open air after reactor meltdown is likely to only
scare employees, while causing no damage at all to the facility, as was
the case there. It is extremely important to know the
differences between the boiling water reactor design and the design of
Chernobyl. At Chernobyl, a hydrogen blast DID cause destruction of the
facility, but it was because the reactor design caused hydrogen and
oxygen at a perfect ratio to ignite at thousands of PSI inside
the reactor pressure vessel. That's a big difference from hydrogen
alone igniting in relatively oxygen starved open air at one atmosphere
(14.5 PSI). The difference would be similar to the difference between a
small firecracker and a case of dynamite; there were many orders of
magnitude lower blast potential at Fukushima.
Just to be absolutely safe after the Three Mile Island incident, many nuclear facilities installed
hydrogen hard vent stacks hooked directly up to the relief valves on
their reactors, and Fukushima was one of them. This was to prevent a
hydrogen buildup in the containment building in the event of a core
meltdown, which caused a minor explosion at Three Mile Island. These
stacks are the tall white towers you see in the photographs
of Fukushima, and they are effective in getting rid of hydrogen
buildup, are directly piped, and vent completely outside. "Hard piped"
means that the electrical failures would have had nothing to do with the
blasts, because a hard vent is exactly that - no fan needed at all
because the system is sealed. Even if the hard piping at all 3 fueled
Fukushima reactors failed entirely, it should not have been any worse
than Three Mile Island which did not have any hard venting to begin
with. While hydrogen venting might be a problem if it ignited, it would
not mean the death of a facility. It makes no sense that at Fukushima we
got a nuclear weapon style mushroom cloud far in excess of the highest
yield conventional bomb.
give you an idea of how big the reactors at Fukushima were, look at this.
It's the top of the same make and model at Fukushima's American twin, TVA owned Brown's Ferry, and it is
only the top. The yellow dome sits above this, and is even bigger. (here
the yellow dome has been removed for refueling). over 150 feet of
reactor sits below that cap. Hydrogen will not vaporize that, which
appears to be what happened to #3, only a nuclear weapon would.
Reactors are about 14 digits beyond incapable of going supercritical
even with a complete core meltdown. The reactors did not explode,
something placed in their vicinity did.
Magna BSP had access to the reactors at this facility. They were based
in Dimona, which is a military base that manufactures nuclear weapons.
Stuxnet was made in their yard. They are stated to be a military
There is extremely strong evidence that Dimona based Magna BSP
placed nuclear weapons at the exploded or vanished reactors at
Fukushima, possibly hidden inside one of their unbelievably GIANT
stereoscopic cameras. These cameras were installed inside the reactor
containment of Fukushima reactor 3 under the cover of a security
contract in the year prior to the disaster. These cameras are identical
in size and appearance to a gun type nuclear weapon.
Since previous hydrogen explosions at boiling water reactors have never
caused any sort of damage to equipment or buildings, even during
complete meltdowns, it begs the question how on earth one at reactor 3
produced a mushroom cloud. Three Mile Island sits in the evidence pool
against what we have been told about Fukushima. History does matter.
One problem with the reporting in the mainstream media is that it
failed to convey just how massive and strong the containment structures really were, as seen in this classified photo.
A hydrogen explosion would only blow the sheet metal off the steel
framed roof if it even did that, at Three Mile Island the hydrogen ignition
did nothing at all. It just scared employees. Another thing the
reporting failed to convey is the gravity of the disaster. Compare the containment diagram
to the remains of reactor 3. It is painfully obvious that many tons of
highly radioactive plutonium in the containment pools is nowhere to be
found, the entire floor they were on is completly gone. We are getting
That was a LOT more than a hydrogen blast, and as a
result there are thousands of pounds of plutonium scattered everywhere.
TEPCO was ridiculed for initially stating that the radiation from the
facility was "immeasurable". I think they at first told the truth. Now
they have this story about the Fukushima 50. Is it in fact a "wag the
dog"? No one could be there and live. Why is remote controlled heavy
equipment doing the cleanup?
The official story is hydrogen blasts, not nukes, so the story line has
to at least be within the far outer limits of what a hydrogen blast
could actually accomplish; not missing reactors and entire fuel pools
I suggest you ponder the pictures and materials presented and reach your
own conclusion. A government issued training manual for the reactors
at Fukushima is here
Now that Osama, who has been dead for 10 years is officially dead, Al
Quaida is going to use a nuke, so they say; I strongly urge you to
consider this article if a nuke actually does go off somewhere or if
other nuclear facilities start acting like Fukushima.
The only reason I believe the management at Fukushima is not telling it
like it really was is because victim status has been so well asserted by
the ethnic group in question that it is career suicide to point the
finger at them, even when they try to kill you. I find it interesting
that all 12 Non Japanese employees of Magna BSP returned to Israel a
week before the tsunami . . . . .
I might have understood the need for Stuxnet if it's use would have ended
with Iran. Unfortunately that does not appear to be the case.
I do hope this article breaks their toy.
For those of you who are reluctant to re-post this because the wording is too strong, I ask you to consider this;
The real answer came out of Fukushima. We have a member of the
international community which has already done horrendous damage to a
very advanced and (presently) innocent civilization and we simply cannot
continue to tolerate it. Consider what ignoring this will cost you.
Are you prepared to have a major disaster at the convenience of the
couch; because you sat there watching TV rather than dragging your butt
over to the computer to at least spread the word? Are your video games,
ball games, 4x4 and porno really worth continuing to lose everything
for? Is your religion going to keep you silent as well? We really need a serious wake up call. Please let this post be
it, rather than some other unforseen disaster.
Thank you to the many readers who pointed out flaws, gave tips, and suggested clarifications, you studied this indeed! My thanks also goes out to the radio hosts who have had me on the air and invited me to appear to discuss this subject.
BTW, this article was written via code entry, without spell check. Consider that.
These references included as e-mail compatible links.